What’s That Red Stuff?

Do you see it, right there? That’s the problem.¬†Herein it shall be explained why and then how it is solved.

terrain_colored_w_red

So we’ve had some talk about the overworld lately and the old post about world map generation still stands. Now we’re dealing with the details of living in it, of filling each biome with appropriate textures and objects. This is proceeding rapidly.

So what’s that red stuff? It’s nothing. In other words, it is a part of the map for which there is no applicable biome. The map tracks moisture and temperature (among other things) on a scale of 0 to 8. We can create a two axis chart of this and draw rectangles that describe the range of conditions in which a biome will appear. In the real world, this results in those fascinating charts I’m sure you’ve seen, for example down a bit on the wikipedia page for biomes – direct image link here.

In the midst of altering biome temperature/moisture settings I found a lot of red stuff appearing and decided that, okay, we need to chart out what the heck is going on here in my working copy of the biome definitions. The result was this:

biome_chart1

See those gaps? They turn red on the map generator. (And overlaps! Jeez.) This made it clear that all of these numbers needed some adjustment, so:

biome_chart2

Much more sensible! (I went and adjusted some of the colours too.)

This results in something more like so:

terrain_colored

Which has no red, no gaps in reality, no problems! … well, plenty of problems, but you’ll see those later.

Just as an excuse to drop in some screenshots, there was a related problem on a smaller scale which looked a little something like this:

mountains_of_madness2 mountains_of_madness1

Dramatic, yes, but actually terrible. This was not a missing biome, but a missing sub-biome.¬†This is the collection of data which defines what appears in-game on-map. Every biome has a collection of sub-biomes. Savanna (uh, “tropical dry plains” in the charts above), for example has sub-biomes called “savanna grassland”, “savanna forest”, and “savanna watering hole” which are used in various proportions to fill in any bits on the game map that are considered savanna.

So in the mountains of madness examples above, there was a typo so the sub-biome wasn’t found. This caused the map generator to default to setting any area of that sub-biome to be made up of rock at the max map height. Easy fix!

Here are a couple shots of new biomes that are coming along:

new_biome2 new_biome1

The lesson? It doesn’t hurt to chart your data.

(And I think you’re going to enjoy all the new biomes to explore.)

Posted in Clockwork Empires | Tagged , , , , ,
10 Comments

10 Responses to “What’s That Red Stuff?”

  1. Retrospecialist says:

    New biomes – Yay!

    { reply }
  2. rydash says:

    Eagerly awaiting when I can start in the deep tundra and then get upset when everyone dies.

    EAGERLY.

    { reply }
  3. Jabberwok says:

    Please make the Mountains of Madness an actual biome. You could add a metric for Evil to your chart. I think DF does something like that…

    { reply }
    • Kamisma says:

      But then the chart will be in 3 dimensions. Do tentacletree spawn in wet and hot evil biomes or rather in cold and dry evil biomes S?

      { reply }
  4. Alavaria says:

    And here I was wondering if the Red meant “Extreme Danger Area” or something…

    { reply }
  5. Cuthalion says:

    Cool! Makes me want to program a biome generator. D:

    { reply }
  6. Thomas says:

    I want to settle in nothing!

    { reply }
  7. Yobgod says:

    Whittaker-Walker 4EVAH. Bailey is a soulless hack who does not UNDERSTAND the joys of the temperate rainforest and seeks to DESTROY THE ENVIRONMENT through classification. Fie I say! A pox on his house!

    { reply }

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *